Decision framework

Solar vs battery in WA - which first?

If you have to choose, install solar first. If you can do both, install them together as one job. Here's the full decision framework with cost, payback and a head-to-head comparison.

The 10-second answer: Solar first if you have to choose - payback is faster (4–6 years vs 3–6) and the rebate stack is simpler. But the smartest move is doing both at once: combined installs save $1,000–$1,500 on labour and unlock the full $10,000+ rebate stack in one project.

Head-to-head: Solar vs Battery in WA (2026)

Solar only (6.6 kW)
Battery only (13.5 kWh)
Typical installed price
$5,500–$7,500
$13,500–$15,500
WA state rebate
Not applicable
Up to $5,000 (Synergy) / $7,500 (Horizon)
Federal rebate
~$2,500–$3,500 via STCs
~$5,000 via Cheaper Home Batteries
Net cost (Synergy)
~$3,500–$4,500
~$3,500–$5,500
Annual bill savings
$1,000–$1,500
$600 (no solar) to $1,400 (with solar)
Payback
3–5 years
3 yrs (with solar) to 10+ yrs (no solar)
Backup power?
No (solar shuts off in blackouts)
Yes (selected or whole-home)

The combined install - the smart play

If you don't have solar yet, the right move is to install solar and battery together as one bundled job. Three reasons:

Typical combined-install price in 2026: $17,000–$21,000 list, $5,000–$7,000 net after all rebates. For a 6.6 kW solar + 13.5 kWh battery setup that's expected to save $2,000+/year.

If you have to choose: install solar first

Three reasons solar wins the "what first" decision:

1. Faster payback even without battery

A standalone 6.6 kW solar system in Perth pays back in 4–5 years from bill reduction + DEBS exports. A standalone battery without solar takes 8–12 years to pay back via time-of-use arbitrage. Solar's value is more immediate.

2. Battery without solar has weak economics

A battery's primary value is storing your own free solar generation for evening use. Without solar, the battery is just arbitraging cheap off-peak grid for expensive peak grid - earning roughly half the value per kWh cycled.

3. Solar is harder to retrofit elegantly

Adding solar later requires inverter changes if you've already installed a battery. Adding a battery to an existing solar system is straightforward if you've picked a hybrid-ready inverter from the start.

When battery-first makes sense

Three edge cases:

The decision framework

Answer these three questions:

  1. Do you have solar already?
    Yes → battery is next.
    No → ideally do both at once.
  2. Is your existing solar 5+ years old?
    Yes → consider replacing the inverter with a hybrid at the same time as the battery install. The original solar panels still have 15+ years of life.
    No → straightforward battery retrofit.
  3. Are you considering an EV in the next 5 years?
    Yes → size both solar (10 kW+) and battery (16–20 kWh) accordingly.
    No → standard sizing (6.6 kW solar, 10–13.5 kWh battery).

What does this look like in dollars?

Three real-world scenarios:

Scenario A: Existing 6.6 kW solar, add battery

Scenario B: No solar, install solar + battery together

Scenario C: No solar, install battery only

What this means for you

For most WA homeowners without existing solar: bundle both into one install. Smaller upfront commitment, faster payback, maximum rebate stack.

For WA homeowners with existing solar: just add a battery. The maths is exceptional in 2026.

For WA homeowners who can't install solar (heritage, strata, north-roof issues): consider a standalone battery for time-of-use arbitrage. Slower payback, real backup power benefit.

Run your scenario

See your specific payback.

Calculator handles solar / no-solar scenarios separately.